What if this time isn't different? (page 1 of 3)
- GCC: Wednesday, December 13 - 2006 at 09:24
In May, we wrote about why we believe this time is different compared to the 1970s/1980s boom-to-bust cycle. There were five main reasons why we believe this is the case, but the most crucial factor is our outlook for oil prices. In this article, we examine the outlook under the assumption that oil prices return to their historical average.
This raises the question of what would prevent another economic outturn similar to that seen in the 1980s following this oil boom. In May, we argued there were five reasons why this time is different:
1) Better demographics
2) Governments have spent the oil windfall more wisely
3) Economies are diversifying
4) Governments have been investing in the wider region
5) Oil prices are, in our opinion, now structurally higher than in history.
The crucial assumption for the GCC economies is that oil prices will not return, on a long-term basis, to the USD 24pb average seen between 1980 and 2004. When I was in Saudi Arabia a couple months ago, the view that oil prices could fall even as low as USD 40-45pb on a sustainable basis was highly debated. Most were thinking that oil prices would go up to USD 80pb, USD 100pb or even USD120pb on a sustainable basis. This suggests most believe our forecast for a USD 45pb long-term average is too cautious.
However, the recent sharp decline in oil prices appears to have reduced the conviction that a sharp rise, particularly on a sustained basis, is inevitable. Moreover, it is possible we are all wrong and oil prices will slump back to historical averages. Here, we analyse the implications for economic activity of a sharp fall in oil prices in 2007. Before we present the findings, it is important to look at the assumptions underlying our analysis.
First, we assume oil prices fall to an average of USD 25pb in 2007, an extreme assumption to say the least, but it does give us some insight as to what may happen even if oil prices were to fall in a more gradual fashion.
Second, we assume this leads OPEC to cut production by a further 4m barrels per day to try to stem the decline and that this is equally shared across the OPEC countries, including those in the GCC.
Third, we assume governments would continue to boost economic activity via stimulatory economic policy even as their fiscal accounts go into significant deficit. Clearly, this would be the case, but it is important to note that this is just taking a one year scenario. If the decline were to happen over a longer period, governments would likely become more frugal over time, resulting in the total impact on the economies being larger, but less dramatic, than in our simplified one year scenario.
The results of our analysis are very interesting, although perhaps not surprising. The first thing to note is the collapse in nominal GDP across the region. All countries would experience a double-digit decline, with most of the countries experiencing around a 30% decline in activity.
Article Options
Disclaimer »
The information comprised in this section is not, nor is it held out to be, a solicitation of any person to take any form of investment decision. The content of the AMEinfo.com Web site does not constitute advice or a recommendation by AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any decision relating to investments or any other matter. You should consult your own independent financial adviser and obtain professional advice before exercising any investment decisions or choices based on information featured in this AMEinfo.com Web site.
AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited can not be held liable or responsible in any way for any opinions, suggestions, recommendations or comments made by any of the contributors to the various columns on the AMEinfo.com Web site nor do opinions of contributors necessarily reflect those of AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited.
In no event shall AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, direct, special, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages, or damages for lost profits, loss of revenue, or loss of use, arising out of or related to the AMEinfo.com Web site or the information contained in it, whether such damages arise in contract, negligence, tort, under statute, in equity, at law or otherwise.

Steve Brice, Regional Head of Research, Standard Chartered Bank



