Browse
related articles
Prince Alwaleed criticises $25bn SGI collapse
- Saudi Arabia: Tuesday, November 11 - 2003 at 09:53
Saudi Arabia is having a very tough time with the terrorist bomb at the weekend focusing attention on internal security. This week also saw a powerful statement from top businessman Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Al Saud about the collapse of the $25 billion Saudi Gas Initiative earlier this year.
'What happened to the Gas Initiative is a farce and a great mistake,' he said. 'Is it reasonable that agreements signed three years ago with the biggest global firms in the presence of the King and Crown Prince are left for some employees to put obstacles?
'How could we abolish the contracts we signed three years ago to sign a new deal with Shell, which I call a token deal because it does not provide large investments for the kingdom. We have missed a major opportunity, not only in gas, pipelines, electricity and water but in many other fields.
The Prince went on to apportion blame for the collapse of the $25 billion SGI project earlier this year which included eight of the world's top energy companies.
'Frankly, it was obstructed by Aramco as it represents the oil bureaucracy in the kingdom...I mean that the Oil Minister and Aramco have wasted this deal.
'The problem is that the loss was not only in foreign investment but to the entire Saudi industry which is in a bad need of products provided by gas...don't forget the thousands of jobs which could have been provided for our youth.'
Last week the Saudi Government approved a $2 billion upstream project comprising Shell, Total and Saudi Aramco to develop gas fields in the Rub Al Khali.
This is all that is left of the $25 billion SGI project and does not include any downstream elements as in the previous deal. The original US partner in the project has also been replaced by Saudi Aramco.
However, local economists believe that more parts of the SGI project will emerge as independent projects, though exactly which firms will be willing to participate, and on what basis, is not at all clear right now. The dust has yet to settle on the $25 billion SGI collapse, and this controversy is sure to continue.
Browse
related articles
- » The office sector in the GCC still experiencing strong growth according to new research
- » Rimal celebrates 20th birthday with launch of new website
- » GE Capital completes first Sukuk offering of $500m
- » Emaar merger talks 'done in one month'
- » British School Al Khubairat makes major donation to water charity
Disclaimer:
The information comprised in this section is not, nor is it held out to be, a solicitation of any person to take any form of investment decision. The content of the AMEinfo.com Web site does not constitute advice or a recommendation by AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any decision relating to investments or any other matter. You should consult your own independent financial adviser and obtain professional advice before exercising any investment decisions or choices based on information featured in this AMEinfo.com Web site.
AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited can not be held liable or responsible in any way for any opinions, suggestions, recommendations or comments made by any of the contributors to the various columns on the AMEinfo.com Web site nor do opinions of contributors necessarily reflect those of AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited.
In no event shall AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, direct, special, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages, or damages for lost profits, loss of revenue, or loss of use, arising out of or related to the AMEinfo.com Web site or the information contained in it, whether such damages arise in contract, negligence, tort, under statute, in equity, at law or otherwise.
Peter J. Cooper
