• HSBC

Correction, or resumption of a major downtrend? (page 2 of 2)

  • Wednesday, March 03 - 2004 at 09:37
And while Vancouver is not in the US, I am sure - based on personal observations - that the price increases quoted - even if in some case atypical of consumer price increases - do suggest that the cost of living is presently rising at a far higher rate than incomes.

Bill King, the author of the excellent and highly recommended daily "King Report" (kingreport@ramkingsec.com) recently also took the CPI figures published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics apart and concluded that they grossly understate the rise in prices in the US.

Among others, he cites a Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation study, which shows that health-care costs premiums have surged 42% over the last three years for employees and families. Hewitt Associates is projecting a further 15% hike for 2004. But the government's Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that health care costs only increased by 3.6% in 2003.

King believes that this is the way the government makes "CPI behavior and inflation disappear, which overstates GDP". In other words, it would seem that US households have difficulties to make ends meet and have only been able to support their consumption because of real estate asset inflation, which allowed them to take out additional borrowings.

Based on the asset inflation in Japan in the late 1980s and in Hong Kong prior to 1997, we know, however, how consumption driven purely by asset inflation ends when the asset inflation eventually turns into a bust - which in every case is sooner or later inevitable.

At the same time, not all is well in Asia, either. Whereas, so far, the bird flu outbreak has had a very limited economic impact, it nevertheless gave investors a reason to sell and led to a sharp correction in a large number of stocks.

In addition, we should be well aware that it is likely that the bird flu will one day mutate and will then be able to jump from human to human, which could lead to a pandemic of major proportions and have a devastating impact on the Asian and world economies.

With respect to the Thai stock market, I recently received the strongest sell signal I have ever experienced: my wife, who in the 25 years that I have known her has never shown any interest in buying stocks, wanted just recently to buy some Thai shares. Some friends had told her that you could buy in the morning and sell in the afternoon and make a profit!

Moreover, as is the case in the US, some stocks that are sensitive to Chinese economic growth have sold off quite sharply in recent weeks, confirming our suspicion that the Chinese economy is slowing down and may disappoint investors who are positioned in the various "reflation trades".

Among the sectors that have run into a serious bout of selling (down around 20% from their peak) we find Chinese oil companies as well as a number of resource stocks around the world, which investors bought on the back of the rising demand by China for commodities.

On a recent visit to Japan, I wasn't surprised to hear from several totally unrelated individual investors that they were buying steel stocks "due to the strong demand for steel from China".

Japanese investors, who have repeatedly shown an uncanny ability to buy near tops of a sector's popularity and price, are another warning flag that the "reflation trade" is a very crowded trade.

We continue, however, to recommend that our readers increase their exposure to oil companies with significant reserves (Chinese oil companies don't have large reserves) and to oil servicing companies, as the fundamentals of the oil industry are compelling.

Asia, with 3.6 billion people or 56% of the world's population consumes less oil than the US with 285 million people. Based on recent trends in oil demand in Asia and given the positive growth prospects for Asia, I would expect Asian daily oil consumption to double from about 20 million barrels to anywhere between 35 million to 50 million barrels in the next ten years or so.

Since current oil production is running at 78 million barrels per day and can due to declining reserves in non-OPEC countries unlikely be increased much, I would expect prices to harden significantly.

In fact, I would not rule out another oil crisis should as a result of some political upheaval in the Middle East supplies be interrupted. Moreover, whereas the NASDAQ seems pricey, to put it mildly, oil companies command very undemanding valuations.

In sum, rising energy prices will lead to higher inflation and higher interest rates. A stronger dollar may hurt some big players who are short dollars and lead to less buying of US treasuries by Asian central banks and so depress the bond market.

Article Options

Disclaimer »

The information comprised in this section is not, nor is it held out to be, a solicitation of any person to take any form of investment decision. The content of the AMEinfo.com Web site does not constitute advice or a recommendation by AME Info FZ LLC / 4C and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any decision relating to investments or any other matter. You should consult your own independent financial adviser and obtain professional advice before exercising any investment decisions or choices based on information featured in this AMEinfo.com Web site.

AME Info FZ LLC / 4C can not be held liable or responsible in any way for any opinions, suggestions, recommendations or comments made by any of the contributors to the various columns on the AMEinfo.com Web site nor do opinions of contributors necessarily reflect those of AME Info FZ LLC / 4C.

In no event shall AME Info FZ LLC / 4C be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, direct, special, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages, or damages for lost profits, loss of revenue, or loss of use, arising out of or related to the AMEinfo.com Web site or the information contained in it, whether such damages arise in contract, negligence, tort, under statute, in equity, at law or otherwise.