Register | Forgot password?
Switch to Arabic
Thursday, December 3 - 2009

G7 meeting: FX, reform and oil: Mostly words, little action

  • Monday, October 04 - 2004 at 08:11

The weekend G7 meeting proved largely to be a non event for the currency markets. The US dollar firmed against Asian currencies in early trade on Monday. We assess the implications of the meeting below.

Article continues below
At the G7 meetings in Washington, there were three areas of focus of market importance. First was the focus on the need for FX flexibility for major economic regions. Aware that this criticism is implicitly aimed at its FX framework, China reiterated it would move towards a more flexible FX regime. But PBOC governor Zhou Xiaochuan said the depegging of USD/CNY will not come in the near term, given the technical difficulties in liberalising its exchange rate. Pressure from the US on China over this issue will remain high, but Beijing will treat exchange rate as a domestic affair and is unlikely to change its current arrangement simply to placate its trade partners.

Second on the agenda was the need for reform with the focus on trying to correct global trade imbalances, which G7 nations said is a shared responsibility. For years, the emphasis has been on Japan and Europe to strengthen their domestic economies in order to take the pressure off the US economy as the sole major source of global growth. This pressure remains. But now, the US is under pressure to prioritise medium-term fiscal consolidation. The twin deficits are likely to remain a huge concern for financial markets and the USD well past the Presidential election next month.

Finally, G7 officials called on oil producers to ensure adequate oil supplies given the risks that high oil price pose for global growth. The price of WTI crude averaged almost USD44 per barrel (pb) in Q3-04 after USD38.40 in Q2 despite a recent easing of the fundamentals. The price reflects nervousness over limited spare capacity against a background of strengthening demand and heightened geopolitical tensions. The long-standing empirical relationship between US oil stocks and prices has broken down this year, as scarcity has become an issue. Moving into Q4 and the Northern Hemisphere winter, we expect prices to remain at least as firm.

We have raised our forecast for Q4 prices to USD45 pb, bringing the average for 2004 to USD41 pb. Rising capacity, increasing evidence of higher stocks, and more moderate global growth should allow prices to ease through 2005, but demand will remain firm. Consequently we expect prices to fall back, but remain well supported. Our 2005 forecast for WTI is US$38 pb. OPEC action is key to this forecast, as we expect the cartel to continue to produce at a high rate through the seasonal downturn in Q2 05 to allow global stocks to build.

Disclaimer:

The information comprised in this section is not, nor is it held out to be, a solicitation of any person to take any form of investment decision. The content of the AMEinfo.com Web site does not constitute advice or a recommendation by AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any decision relating to investments or any other matter. You should consult your own independent financial adviser and obtain professional advice before exercising any investment decisions or choices based on information featured in this AMEinfo.com Web site.

AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited can not be held liable or responsible in any way for any opinions, suggestions, recommendations or comments made by any of the contributors to the various columns on the AMEinfo.com Web site nor do opinions of contributors necessarily reflect those of AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited.

In no event shall AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, direct, special, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages, or damages for lost profits, loss of revenue, or loss of use, arising out of or related to the AMEinfo.com Web site or the information contained in it, whether such damages arise in contract, negligence, tort, under statute, in equity, at law or otherwise.