• HSBC

Anger! Jargon (page 1 of 2)

  • Tuesday, March 21 - 2006 at 11:09

A couple years ago, I advised a major credit card company on its naming strategy. It should have been a straightforward process but turned out to be a nightmarish operation.

The company had established hundreds, maybe thousands, of acronyms for its products, services, and divisions over the years. It had dug itself into a linguistic hole and was buried in terms incomprehensible to anyone outside the organization.

It's easy for insiders to become blind and deaf to company jargon. The result is a brand's identity becomes obscured by meaningless, invented terms.

When you repeatedly use a phrase, term, or brand name, you tend to shorten it. Without real awareness of the abbreviation's growing currency, you've created a second brand name. The most obvious example of this evolution is Coke. Cola drinkers and company employees created the short version of the brand name Coca-Cola. It's been used internally and externally for over 20 years. Result? The Coca-Cola Company fights an ongoing dual-brand challenge.

Coke has become a familiar word. It's a special case. What about ADT, PPT, DET, ADI, and FTI? All are brand names used internally at various companies. Can you guess what they represent?

Using abbreviations internally carries the risk of communicating them externally. Internal company jargon kills the clarity of a brand's voice. Ever visited a financial or insurance company site, scrolled down a massive list of options, and wondered what the heck terms meant? Have you ever asked yourself, "What on earth does that mean?" when you've come across an obscure word on a site? Found yourself wondering how to identify your needs against a set of seemingly inadequate and alien site options? I've certainly had these experiences. They usually frustrate me so much, I give up on the offender and proceed to another company's site.

Now that aside - another aspect is creating a major chasm between the consumer and your brand - the legal disclaimers. Tell me - how often do you in fact read the long-winded legal disclaimer following the software you purchase. You know the one where you typically scroll down to the very bottom where you need to tick a box and move on to install the software? Or what about those two paragraph clauses more or less decorating any email pumped out of any larger company? Not to forget the legal disclaimers imbedded in everything from tickets, warranties, and product instructions - well even how to operate my shower handle at home?

The fact is that this new intruding language - is not and will never be there for the customer's sake - in fact it is in many ways the same as negotiating your divorce before you're even married. But in the battle of the heat we're all grabbed with the anti friendly consumer behavior - creating a distance between those who pays our salaries (the customers in case you forgot) and our brand.

Your internal world is very different from the world outside. You're 100 percent focused, 24 hours a day, every day on your branch of expertise. Your customers hardly give you any thought. It's only natural you're infinitely more familiar with your territory and its language than any of your customers. Problem is, lots of companies forget this obvious fact. They use "advanced internal language" on Web sites, in brochures, and even in ads.

Your job as a brand manager is to keep a watchful eye on terms and phrases used in your branding to avoid finding yourself in a situation in which your brand literally speaks to your customers in a language they can't understand.

I'm referring to all your language, including that on your navigation panel, in offerings categories, and on forms. Forget about any internal jargon in communications.
Martin Lindstrom. 
Martin Lindstrom.
Article Options

Notes and Media Contacts »

About the author:
Martin Lindstrom is one of the world's most respected branding gurus according to the Chartered Institute of Marketing. He sits on several boards around the world, and his blue-chip client list includes Mars, Pepsi, American Express, Mercedes-Benz, Reuters, Visa, McDonald's, Kellogg's, Ericsson, Yellow Pages and Microsoft. Developed during 20 years of hands-on marketing experience, Lindstrom's unique vision is supported by global studies and endorsed by the CEOs of McDonald's, Mattel, LEGO and Disney. Martin Lindstrom's last four books on branding, written with industry icons such as Don Peppers, Martha Rogers, Patricia Seybold and Philip Kotler, are sold worldwide and have been translated into more than 20 languages. His latest highly acclaimed book, BRAND sense, written in partnership with Philip Kotler, is published by Simon & Schuster New York. Visit MartinLindstrom.com to learn more.

Disclaimer »

Articles in this section are primarily provided directly by the companies appearing or PR agencies which are solely responsible for the content. The companies concerned may use the above content on their respective web sites provided they link back to http://www.ameinfo.com

Any opinions, advice, statements, offers or other information expressed in this section of the AMEinfo.com Web site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited. AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited is not responsible or liable for the content, accuracy or reliability of any material, advice, opinion or statement in this section of the AMEinfo.com Web site.

For details about submitting your stories, please read the guide - all content published is subject to our terms and conditions