in

Three step brand check up

Sorry, but this is for your own good. Open wide. Say, 'Uniqueness, consistency, consumer focus.'

  • Sunday, May 28 - 2006 at 07:49
Martin Lindstrom.
Martin Lindstrom.

related stories
Well, say what you like, so long as you use your brand's distinctive voice, use terms that are recognizably your brand's, and speak from your customer's point of view.

I'm checking how well you handle your online brand presence. Thing is, if you're stuck with the same thing all day, every day, you tend not to notice the obvious. You don't see the forest for the trees. This exercise may be both obvious and painful. In the end, you'll agree that by facing up to the examination, you'll help yourself help your brand.

Test One: Can you smash your site to pieces and still recognize it from the fragments?


Some time ago, I reflected on the genesis of the Coca-Cola bottle. It was intentionally designed in such way even if a bottle was broken into shards, you'd still recognize the pieces as having once been part of a Coke bottle. You'd still see brand identity in a single fragment piece. Use this as an analogy for assessing your brand's Web site integrity.

What if the logo is removed from the site? Would a visitor still know which brand hosts it? Would your brand's voice still be heard in the copy? Does your site use language in a unique way that's clearly reflective of the brand? Does it use terms people immediately associate with your brand, which cannot be mistaken as belonging to another? Are the graphics distinctly your brand's? What about navigation? Does it bear your brand's signature? Is it consistent with your offline approach? Does it also reflect your brand's unique personality? Do your site's icons reflect the nature of the brand?

Test Two: Do your communication materials have synergy?


If I looked at 10 random pages from your site, 10 pages from your corporate brochure, 10 of your latest ads, 10 pieces of other promotional material, and your letterhead, would I discern synergy between all these elements? Is the font consistent? Are color, picture style, spacing, and graphics consistent across all media? Or would I simply see a mess of haphazard materials?

Test Three: Does your site talk to your marketing department or your customers?


Does your Web site discuss 'benefits' instead of 'added value'? What's the difference? Benefits address concrete technical advantages (think of a stereo system). But benefits don't communicate the all-embracing, high-quality surround sound that will impress friends, do justice to a favorite opera, and create just the right ambience. Benefits don't answer 'What's in it for me?' Added value, on the other hand, speaks to the consumer's self-interest.

Every sentence, phrase, and sales argument on your site must bear the consumer in mind, not the tech department or whoever else is in charge of developing your product or services. Added value is what I'll gain as a result of using the product. Will it make me more relaxed? Increase my happiness? Make my work more effective? Save me money?

Many companies forget communication is about getting consumers to see brand benefits for themselves. To get this across, a brand must speak from the consumers' point of view, not the marketing department's. Remove all those meaningless benefits from your site and other communications materials. Replace them with the added customer value you know customers are after.

How well did score in your brand checkup? I'd be impressed if you passed all three tests. If you did, relax -- for now. Next week, expect a slightly more difficult test.

If you couldn't meet these simple criteria, work fast. You've only got seven days until I'm back with a more rigorous examination of your brand's performance.


About the author:
Martin Lindstrom is one of the world's most respected branding gurus according to the Chartered Institute of Marketing. He sits on several boards around the world, and his blue-chip client list includes Mars, Pepsi, American Express, Mercedes-Benz, Reuters, Visa, McDonald's, Kellogg's, Ericsson, Yellow Pages and Microsoft. Developed during 20 years of hands-on marketing experience, Lindstrom's unique vision is supported by global studies and endorsed by the CEOs of McDonald's, Mattel, LEGO and Disney. Martin Lindstrom's last four books on branding, written with industry icons such as Don Peppers, Martha Rogers, Patricia Seybold and Philip Kotler, are sold worldwide and have been translated into more than 20 languages. His latest highly acclaimed book, BRAND sense, written in partnership with Philip Kotler, is published by Simon & Schuster New York. Visit MartinLindstrom.com to learn more.
Sunday, May 28 - 2006 at 07:49 UAE local time (GMT+4)

Replication or redistribution in whole or in part is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited.

This Article was updated on Saturday, May 26 - 2007


Disclaimer:
Articles in this section are primarily provided directly by the companies appearing or PR agencies which are solely responsible for the content. The companies concerned may use the above content on their respective web sites provided they link back to http://www.ameinfo.com

Any opinions, advice, statements, offers or other information expressed in this section of the AME Info Web site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited. AME Info FZ LLC / Emap Limited is not responsible or liable for the content, accuracy or reliability of any material, advice, opinion or statement in this section of the AME Info Web site.

For details about submitting your stories, please read the guide - all content published is subject to our terms and conditions

Email newsletters »

Business Directory »

The news you choose

News and Articles »

Today's top stories »

 

Current Events »

Advertisement »