Gulf Region still on course for six nuclear reactors by 2020 despite Fukushima
- United Arab Emirates: Thursday, July 19 - 2012 at 13:35
- PRESS RELEASE
The disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan on 11th March 2011 caused a widespread reassessment of the potential dangers associated with nuclear power. An immediate response from the Japanese and German governments mean that nuclear output in those countries halved, then dropped by a quarter year on year in 2011; with Japanese nuclear output fallingto zero in the first half of 2012. Following the disaster, anti-nuclear sentiment has become palpable throughout the world with official proposals to reduce nuclear use or become nuclear-free becoming commonplace.
And yet, actual use of nuclear power generation has shifted less than might be expected: global nuclear power generation only fell 4.3% year on year in 2011, back to levels last seen in the early 2000s. Apart from Germany and Japan, only the USA had a material reduction in nuclear output, and for reasons other than government policy. Nuclear generation in all of the BRIC nations actually increased, as did output in other countries with reliance on nuclear such as France, South Korea, the UK and Canada.
While global nuclear retrenchment may be less dramatic than is sometimes portrayed, thenew concerns around nuclear have directly affectedthe Gulf Region.For instance, in February this year the Kuwaiti government decided to abandon its nuclear power programme that had aimed to build four reactors by 2022. The Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research cited the Fukushima Daiichi disaster as the fundamental reason for cancelling the programme, though the difficulty of finding a suitable nuclear repository may also have been a factor.
Nevertheless, Kuwait's reticence towards nuclear power has not affected other Gulf States: the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar all continue to pursue nuclear power programmes.
In the UAE the Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation (ENEC)has received approval to begin groundwork preparation on the future site of what could be the first nuclear reactors in the Arab world: Braka Units 1 and 2. The company is now waiting for final approval to start construction. Fukushima did have some impact - ENEC was forced to redesign Braka 1 and 2 to increase safety resilience against earthquakes, tsunamis and power outages - but it did not stop development. The UAE is still keeping to its larger plans to have Braka 1 and 2 as the first of four proposed reactors due to be completed by 2020 at an estimated cost of $20bn.
In June last year, Saudi Arabia announced its intention to build sixteen nuclear reactors by 2030, at an estimated cost of $112bn. KACARE, responsible for Saudi's nuclear development planning, has said that it plans to have two reactors built by 2020 and to add approximately two per year thereafter to 2030.Qatar, meanwhile, has signed deals with France and Russia for training, R&D, construction and operational assistance with Qatar's nuclear power programme, which seeks to develop up to 5.4 GW of nuclear capacity by 2036.
"The world's commitment to nuclear power has largely survived Fukushima intact," says Badr Jafar. "The Gulf region is no different with development plans continuing, albeit more cautiously," says Jafar. "The strategic benefits of energy supply diversification away from oil and gas have been deemed to outweigh the cost and security implications of nuclear. While such diversification is likely to offer benefits it is essential that regional policymakers not neglect oil and gas industry investment as a result. Nuclear is only ever likely to supplement, not replace the region's core oil and gas energy system."
Articles in this section are primarily provided directly by the companies appearing or PR agencies which are solely responsible for the content. The companies concerned may use the above content on their respective web sites provided they link back to http://www.ameinfo.com
Any opinions, advice, statements, offers or other information expressed in this section of the AMEinfo.com Web site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Mediaquest FZ LLC. Mediaquest FZ LLC is not responsible or liable for the content, accuracy or reliability of any material, advice, opinion or statement in this section of the AMEinfo.com Web site.